Dick, nice water level comparison photos! But, relative…
Being here on the “deep side” of the lake, we noticed a slight increase of the water moving up our beach. The slope of the land going down into the water affords us deeper water and shorter docks; our dock is only 36′ long. That said, we recognized/realized probably only a foot-or-so of water creeping to the bank; probably only 2-3 inches vertical rise; speculation, of course; I didn’t set a benchmark. It would be like pouring the same amount of water in a glass compared to pouring it on a plate; your end of the lake has less gradient.
As mentioned before, the water table, ground water and most important, the aquifer has to rise before the lake level sustains and contains water without perking down. Now emphasis is being addressed to the surface water, which, until this time, wasn’t of concern in legislation. WAL (Wisconsin Association of Lakes) is pursuing and pushing legislators to take in its importance.
I’ve included a recent one of the shoreline here, but no comparison from last year. From a guess, I’d say the water moved horizontally towards the bank about a foot-or-so.
I found this old photo in the archives. I recall the old-timers telling of water levels being way down; goes back to the Jack Ellis days and subsequent Lee Lake Dam project. The photo shows water well-away from the banks with weeds growing towards the lake (must have been low for a few, perhaps several years. Notice also the walkways added to the piers from shore.
Roger (Thanks for the photos; great comparison.)
















